leg, AA33
transcription factor - novel - pair rule gene - contributes to neuroblast cell identity - identities of medulla neurons of the optic lobe are pre-determined in the larval medulla primordium, which is subdivided into concentric zones characterized by the expression of four transcription factors: Drifter, Runt, Homothorax and Brain-specific homeobox
Please see the JBrowse view of Dmel\run for information on other features
To submit a correction to a gene model please use the Contact FlyBase form
AlphaFold produces a per-residue confidence score (pLDDT) between 0 and 100. Some regions with low pLDDT may be unstructured in isolation.
Gene model reviewed during 5.53
Gene model reviewed during 5.56
2.6 (northern blot)
509 (aa); 68 (kD observed); 53 (kD predicted)
Click to get a list of regulatory features (enhancers, TFBS, etc.) and gene disruptions (point mutations, indels, etc.) within or overlapping Dmel\run using the Feature Mapper tool.
The testis specificity index was calculated from modENCODE tissue expression data by Vedelek et al., 2018 to indicate the degree of testis enrichment compared to other tissues. Scores range from -2.52 (underrepresented) to 5.2 (very high testis bias).
Comment: anlage in statu nascendi
Comment: anlage in statu nascendi
Comment: anlage in statu nascendi
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm anlage in statu nascendi
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm anlage in statu nascendi
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm anlage in statu nascendi
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm anlage
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm anlage
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm anlage
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm anlage
Comment: reported as ventral nerve cord anlage
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm primordium
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm primordium
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm primordium
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm primordium
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm primordium
Comment: reported as procephalic ectoderm primordium
Expression was examined at four phases of embryonic stage 5. The striped pattern becomes visible in phase 1, (0-5'), all stripes except stripe 7 are expressed during phase 2 (5-17'), and their spacing and expression levels become largely uniform by phase 3 (17-30'). The stripes initially appear less clearly separated and more graded.
run is expressed in anterior midline glia but not in posterior midline glia in stage 12 embryos. After its early pair rule and segment polarity expression patterns in early embryos, run expression becomes more expansive. At stage 10, run expression along with en expression divides the midline into four regions, anterior (runt[+], en[-]), middle (runt[-], en[-]), posterior (runt[-], en[+]), and extreme posterior (runt[-], en[-]). At stage 10, run is expressed in 4-5 midline cells. At stage 11, expression is initiated in 2-3 additional cells flanking the runt[+] en[-] region, thus generating about six run[+] anterior midline glia in the anterior of each segment. By the end of stage 11, run is expressed in all anterior midline glia.
run transcripts are most abundant between 2 and 4 hours of embryonic development on northern blots. They are detected in younger and older embryos at much lower levels. Low levels of transcript are also detected in larvae and adult females. run transcripts are detected by in situ hybridization at embryonic cycle 13 in a broad domain extending from 10% to 70% egg length. Early in stage 14, a pair rule pattern of seven stripes becomes apparent with the stripes of expression appearing to be wider than the intervening gaps of expression. Just prior to the completion of cellularization, the pattern changes to a pattern of expression in every segment. This pattern persists throughout germ band extension. At this time, expression is also observed in the head region from 75-85% egg length and in the proctodeal primordium. The boundaries of the run expression stripes were compared to those of other segmentation genes. The run stripes are as wide or wider than the ftz stripes. The run stripes partially overlap the eve stripes and partilly overlap the ftz stripes but appear to be in direct opposition to the h stripes. A difference was observed in the localization of run and Kr transcripts within the cortical cytoplasm.
Comment: rows C, D, E
Comment: row 2-3 of ventral neurogenic region
Comment: initiates within 1 column posterior to the morphogenetic furrow
Comment: initiates about 7 columns posterior to the morphogenetic furrow
run protein is expressed in the differentiated neurons of the middle domain of the medulla anlage from third instar larvae and in pupa until 12h APF. Its domain is located in between the concentric domains of vvl distally and hth proximally. Thereafter and in adults, run protein is found in layers 8 to 10 of the medulla.
Expression assayed at stages 9, 11, 13, and 17. Expression may be continuous between assayed stages in some tissues.
Expression in procephalic neuroblasts stage 9-11: deuterocerebrum - d1-3, d5, v2, v5-7; protocerebrum - ad3, ad11, cd8-12, cd15-20, pd3, pd9, pd12, pd13, pd17, pd18, pv1
run is expressed extensively in the developing nervous system. Neural expression is first observed in delaminating neuroblasts at 4.5 hours of development (about 5 per hemisegment). Expression is also observed in daughter ganglion mother cells and becomes increasingly complex as development proceeds. Double staining with antibodies against eve protein show that one site of run protein expression is in all of the neurons and GMCs of the EL neuron lineage. Another site of run protein expression is in some of the U neurons (CQ neurons).
run protein is expressed in a pair rule pattern of 7 stripes in the blastoderm embryo. The position of run protein stripes was compared to that of other segmentation genes. The h protein stripes are anterior to and complementary to the run protein stripes. The eve protein stripes lie anterior to the run protein stripes but overlap them partially. Two rows of eve expression are anterior to a two-row region of overlap with run followed by two rows of run expression and then two rows of non-expression before the next eve stripe. Similarly, run and ftz double staining shows that the run stripes are anterior to the ftz stripes but are partially overlapping. In early germ band extension the run pattern changes from a pair rule pattern to a segmental pattern and in addition, expression is observed in the head. Two groups of cells are stained in the head, a dorso-lateral group of 10 cells and a ventral group of 7 less intensely staining cells. The pattern becomes more complex at full germ band extension. At this stage in the segmented part of the embryo, the staining is strongest just off the midline and fades laterally. The stained cells along the midline probably correspond to neuroblasts. During germ band retraction, staining becomes evident in both the CNS and the PNS. Roughly 50 cells per hemi-segment are stained in the CNS at the completion of germ band retraction. PNS staining is also evident.
JBrowse - Visual display of RNA-Seq signals
View Dmel\run in JBrowsePlease Note FlyBase no longer curates genomic clone accessions so this list may not be complete
Please Note This section lists cDNAs and ESTs that fall within the genomic extent of the gene model, which may include cDNAs and ESTs of genes within introns, or of overlapping genes. Please see JBrowse for alignment of the cDNAs and ESTs to the gene model.
For each fully sequenced cDNA the DGRC maintains various forms of the cDNA (e.g tagged or untagged) in several different host vectors for subsequent cloning and expression in Drosophila and Drosophila cell lines.
Haploinsufficient locus (not associated with strong haplolethality or haplosterility).
DNA-protein interactions: genome-wide binding profile assayed for run protein in 0-12 hr embryos; see mE1_TFBS_run collection report.
dsRNA has been made from templates generated with primers directed against this gene. RNAi of run results in dorsal overextension of primary dendrites, defects in dendrite morphogenesis and a reduction in lateral branching.
Many but not all regulatory properties of the '7-stripe' regulatory region are conserved between D.melanogaster and D.virilis. The similarity between the homologous sequences is surprisingly low suggesting pair rule target sequences are less constrained during evolution than gap gene input elements and that functional elements mediating pair rule interactions can be dispersed over many kilobases.
Ecol\lacZ reporter gene constructs have been used to demonstrate the elaborate pattern of run is generated as the sum of a series of stage-specific and position-specific subcomponents. Results identify several separable cis-regulatory elements that are responsible for mediating the responses to the different regulatory cues.
The run domain has DNA binding properties and regions outside the domain are important for in vivo function.
Expression of stripes in the blastoderm embryo can be generated by a two-step mode which involves regulatory interactions among the primary pair-rule genes h and run. Expression of h stripes 3 and 4 is directed by a common cis-acting element that results in an initial broad band of gene expression covering three stripe equivalents. Subsequently this expression domain is split by repression in the forthcoming interstripe region, a process mediated by a separate cis-acting element that responds to run activity.
Comparisons of early development to that in other insects have revealed conservation of some aspects of development, as well as differences that may explain variations in early patterning events.
Ectopic ttk expression causes complete or near complete repression of ftz and significant repression of eve, odd, h and runt.
Expression of run has been used as a marker for a subset of neuroblasts in study of requirement for wg gene product for neuroblast specification and formation in the CNS.
Muscle phenotype of mutants studied using polarised light microscopy and antibody staining to detect Mhc-lacZ reporter gene expression in muscles.
Expression of prd depends on activation by gap gene hb, Kr, kni and gt products. Primary pair rule gene products act primarily in subsequent modulation rather than activation of prd stripes. Factors activating prd expression in the pair rule mode interact with those activating it along the dorso-ventral axis.
The run domain identifies an evolutionarily conserved structural motif important for both DNA-binding and protein-protein interaction.
The regulation of run mRNA expression by maternal, gap, pair-rule and segment polarity genes during early embryogenesis has been investigated.
The run gene is required to generate asymmetries within parasegmental domains. run is required to limit the domains of en-expression in odd-numbered parasegments, while odd is required to limit the domains of en-expression in even-numbered parasegments. Activation of en at the anterior margins of the parasegments requires repression of run and odd by eve.
Post cellularization run expression is repressed by ectopic eve expression, precellularization ectopic eve expression stimulates run expression.
The sis-b function of sc and the segmentation gene run have a vital interaction in a transheterozygous state: run acts as a numerator element in the signalling of the X:A ratio. run cooperates with sc to activate Sxl in the central region of the embryo. Increases in the dose of run cause segmentation defects that may be lethal.
The expression of run and its role in neurogenesis has been studied.
Mutations in zygotic pair rule gene run interact with RpII140wimp.
run has been cloned and characterised.
Injection of protein synthesis inhibitors into early embryos induces expression of run mRNA in virtually all regions of the embryo.
run is expressed and required at the cellular blastoderm stage in cells that will serve as precursors to both the epidermis and CNS.
Genetic analysis demonstrates that run is dispensable for efficient homeotic gene expression in the visceral mesoderm.
A screen for X-linked genes that affect embryo morphology revealed run.
The localised requirements for run have been investigated using mosaic animals.
run mutants display pair-rule segment defects.
A pair-rule embryonic lethal; causes deletions of the dentical belts of the mesothoracic and the first, third, fifth and seventh abdominal segments, extending through the more anterior naked cuticle and into the denticle belts of the next most anterior segments. Deleted regions appear to be replaced by mirror image duplications of the remaining more anterior pattern elements. Deleted regions exceed duplications in size, resulting in shorter embryos. The amount of material deleted varies among segments, alleles and among animals with the same alleles. Hypomorphic alleles do not remove as much tissue as amorphs and weak hypomorphic alleles produce occasional survivors missing methathoracic legs or halteres or both and are frequently missing one or more abdominal tergites. run31, among the weakest alleles, survives to adulthood. Deficiencies for run have discernible dominant effects on embryonic development; extra doses of run+ produce anti-runt phenotype, i.e., 30% of males with two doses of run+ display deletions of portions of the dentical belts of A6 and less frequently of A2 and A8; males with three run+ alleles more severely affected with 70% penetrance. run+ postulated to repress eve function and positively regulate ftz; run mutants show expansion of stripes of eve expression and premature disappearance of stripes of ftz expression in the embryo (Frasch and Levine, 1987). ftz+ expression in cellular blastoderm reduced in four anterior stripes; A5-A7 expression abnormal, possibly reflecting pattern duplication; nuclear shape abnormal (Carroll and Scott, 1986). For expression pattern later in development see Kania et al. (1990). run is autonomous in gynandromorphs both for missing and for mirror-image duplicated phenotypes, suggesting that the duplication does not result from proliferation following cell death (Gergen and Wieschaus, 1985). Also, the earliest embryonic phenotypes are dosage compensated (Gergen, 1987). run embryos produced by homozygous ovarian clones not different from those produced by heterozygous mothers (Wieschaus and Noell, 1986).
Source for identity of: run CG1849