FB2024_03 , released June 25, 2024
Allele: Dmel\fors
Open Close
General Information
Symbol
Dmel\fors
Species
D. melanogaster
Name
sitter
FlyBase ID
FBal0004144
Feature type
allele
Associated gene
Associated Insertion(s)
Carried in Construct
Also Known As
Sitter
Key Links
Genomic Maps

Allele class
Nature of the Allele
Allele class
Progenitor genotype
Cytology
Description

The fors and forR alleles differ in a SNP that lies within a predicted Mad protein-binding site in a region upstream of the pr4 transcription start site. The SNP is a C in fors and an A in forR (the latter is predicted to reduce Mad protein binding).

Mutations Mapped to the Genome
Curation Data
Type
Location
Additional Notes
References
Comment:

The fors (sitter) and forR (rover) alleles differ in a SNP that lies within a predicted Mad protein-binding site in a region upstream of the pr4 transcription start site. The SNP is a C in fors and an A in forR (the latter is predicted to reduce Mad protein binding).

Variant Molecular Consequences
Associated Sequence Data
DNA sequence
Protein sequence
 
Expression Data
Reporter Expression
Additional Information
Statement
Reference
 
Marker for
Reflects expression of
Reporter construct used in assay
Human Disease Associations
Disease Ontology (DO) Annotations
Models Based on Experimental Evidence ( 1 )
Disease
Evidence
References
Modifiers Based on Experimental Evidence ( 0 )
Disease
Interaction
References
Comments on Models/Modifiers Based on Experimental Evidence ( 0 )
 
Disease-implicated variant(s)
 
Phenotypic Data
Phenotypic Class
Phenotype Manifest In
Detailed Description
Statement
Reference

fors/fors third instar larvae display a significantly shorter travel path during feeding and increased food intake compared to forR/forR larvae.

forR homozygous larvae show significant increase in travel path length during feeding and food search compared to fors homozygotes, while the path length of forR/fors transheterozygotes is not significantly different from forR homozygotes. However, the food intake of forR larvae is significantly lower than that of both fors and forR/fors mutants. for0/forR transheterozygotes display longer travel path and reduced food intake compared to for0/fors.

forR/fors have a similar foraging success to flies homozygous for forR which is significantly higher than fors homozygotes.

Expressing fordsRNA.UAS.pr4 under the control of Scer\GAL4da.PU in a fors homozygous background results in increased foraging success, but no difference in total distance travelled when compared to fors homozygous controls.

Expressing fordsRNA.UAS.pr4 under the control of Scer\GAL4da.PU in a forR/fors background has no effect on foraging success or distance travelled when compared to forR/fors controls.

The 'food leaving' behaviour score for fors flies is low for flies raised in food-deprived conditions and high for flies raised in well-fed conditions. However, the increase in the score from FD to FED is greater for forR than fors or fors2 flies.

In well-fed conditions, adult forR flies have almost twice as much energy stored in whole-body lipid and about half the energy stored in carbohydrates compared to adult fors or fors2 flies.

fors and fors2 flies exhibit less food-related plasticity than forR flies for a large majority of behavioural, metabolic and gene expression traits.

Homozygous fors and trans-heterozygous forR/fors mutants show impaired visual pattern memory.

Similarly to wild-type flies, homozygous fors flies are able to recognise different patterns. The thermotolerance of homozygous fors mutants is similar to that of wild-type flies.

fors flies exhibit a reduced sucrose responsiveness.

Fifteen minutes after a single conditioning cycle or a spaced (five conditioning cycles separated by 20-minute intervals) protocol, forR homozygous mutants show stronger avoidance of the odor previously associated with shock than fors or fors2 homozygous mutants .

24 hours after a spaced (five conditioning cycles separated by 20-minute intervals) protocol, the forR homozygous mutants show weaker memory of the association between an odor and shock than fors or fors2 homozygous mutants.

24 hours after a massed (five conditioning cycles immediately after one another) protocol, there is no difference between forR, fors and fors2 homozygous mutants.

In fors homozygous mutants, expression of forUAS.T2 under the control of either Scer\GAL430Y,

Scer\GAL4c739 or Scer\GAL4Tab2-201Y leads to higher fifteen-minute memory scores after a single conditioning cycle (similar to those observed in forR homozygous mutants) and lower 24 hour memory scores after a spaced protocol (similar to or below those observed in forR homozygous mutants) when compared to controls.

Learning performance of fors2 homozygous mutants is indistinguishable from that of fors homozygous mutants.

forR adults are significantly more active compared to fors adults in a locomotor activity assay.

A significant increase in capa-stimulated fluid transport is observed at 50 and 60 minutes in Malpighian tubules from fors animals, compared to those from forR animals. This difference is especially pronounced at 60 minutes. There is no difference in basal fluid transport rates between the two lines.

fors flies show a more rapid response decrement of the long-latency giant fiber response induced by electrical stimulation than forR flies. forR/fors flies show a rate of response decrement intermediate between that of fors and that of forR.

fors and forR/fors flies show full recovery from decrement to five-failure criterion of the long-latency electrically induced giant fiber response after 5 seconds of rest.

fors larvae do not show "scribbler" behaviour (significantly more turning behaviour than wild-type larvae) on non-nutritive agar.

In the giant neuron culture system spontaneous nerve firing occurred in 36% of neurons examined. Supernumerary aftershock nerve spikes are evident after cessation of current injections in 18% of neurons. In voltage clamp studies, fors neurons show significantly lower levels of both peak and sustained outward currents compared with forR. Half-activation voltages of the peak (but not sustained) K+ currents in fors and fors2 are shifted towards positive potentials compared with forR. Slopes of voltage dependent activation are similar for the three alleles for both peak and sustained currents. Large amplitude (up to 5nA) spontaneous ejcs occur at high frequency, evoked ejcs that are time-locked to the stimulus show significantly greater amplitude. Motor terminal projections on the larval muscles show ectopic nerve entry points on the muscle surface. The number of ectopic nerve points in the muscles of fors, fors2 and forlsR92 correlates with excitability levels of both central neurons and motor axons.

The initial response to 1% oxygen hypoxia, cessation of feeding and movement to the surface of the yeast, occurs similarly in forR and fors, though the fors larvae move more slowly. However significantly fewer fors than forR (13% as opposed to 49%) go on the next phase of the behavioral response, migrating away from the yeast. While fors embryos survive 12 hrs of hypoxia poorly, forR embryos survive well. fors larvae also recover less well from hypoxia than do forR larvae. Hypoxia blocks BrdU incorporation in cultured CNS of forR, but not fors larvae. fors embryos retain the ability to block S phase under hypoxia. fors larvae have less frequent and shorter terminal ramifications in their tracheal system than wild type.

Overexpression of four copies of P{hs-dg2} in larvae changes foraging behaviour to the rover phenotype.

fors/fors; Csr3/+ larvae show "rover-like" foraging behaviour.

Homozygous fors larvae have shorter crawling paths than homozygous forR larvae, and are parisitised less often by A.tabida than homozygous forR larvae. Homozygous third instar larvae have shorter crawling paths than homozygous second instar larvae.

Larvae have shorter locomotory trails than larvae for forR.

Adults carrying the R allele walk farther from food source after feeding than do adults with the S strain. Unlike in larval tests, the rover behavior of adults is not dominant over the sitter behavior.

Larvae homozygous for the "sitter" alleles fors or forlsR92 move equally as well as larvae homozygous for the "rover" forR allele on non-nutritive substrates. Larvae homozygous for the forR allele take more strides, not longer ones, than larvae carrying fors or forlsR92 on foraging substrates.

sitter allele

External Data
Interactions
Show genetic interaction network for Enhancers & Suppressors
Phenotypic Class
NOT suppressed by
Statement
Reference
Other
Phenotype Manifest In
Additional Comments
Genetic Interactions
Statement
Reference

G9aDD1 homozygosity eliminates the differences in foraging behavior between forR homozygotes, fors homozygotes or forR/fors heterozygotes.

Flies double homozygous for G9aDD1 and fors live significantly longer when starved than flies carrying wild-type alleles of G9a. The increase in starvation resistance is significantly greater in fors than forR homozygotes.

CG11699EY05909 fors double mutant flies show the same profile as CG11699EY05909 single mutant flies in an olfaction-based exploration assay when benzaldehyde is used as the odour source.

Trans-heterozygous fors +/+ lilli189Y flies show impaired visual pattern memory.

Pan-neural expression of lilliScer\UAS.cMa via Scer\GAL4elav.PLu fails to rescue the memory defects of fors flies.

Xenogenetic Interactions
Statement
Reference
Complementation and Rescue Data
Partially rescued by
Comments

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWa driven by Scer\GAL4NP6561 rescues the memory defect for "contour orientation" of homozygous fors flies.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWa driven by Scer\GAL4NP6561 fails to rescue the memory defect for "elevation" of homozygous fors flies.

Pan-neural expression of forScer\UAS.cWa via Scer\GAL4elav.PLu rescues the memory defect in fors mutants.

Pan-neural expression of forScer\UAS.cWb via Scer\GAL4elav.PLu rescues the memory defect in fors mutants.

Pan-neural expression of forScer\UAS.cWc via Scer\GAL4elav.PLu rescues the memory defect in fors mutants.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWa via Scer\GAL4c205 is sufficient to partially restore visual pattern memory in fors flies. Only memory for "elevation" is restored, but not that for "contour".

Temperature shift experiments using Scer\GAL80ts.αTub84B demonstrate that Scer\GAL4c205-driven forScer\UAS.cWa expression in adults is sufficient for the rescue of the fors visual memory defects.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWb via Scer\GAL4c205 is sufficient to restore visual pattern memory in fors flies.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWc via Scer\GAL4c205 is sufficient to restore visual pattern memory in fors flies.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWa via Scer\GAL4c819 is sufficient to restore visual pattern memory in fors flies. Memory for both "elevation" and "contour" is restored.

Temperature shift experiments using Scer\GAL80ts.αTub84B demonstrate that Scer\GAL4c819-driven forScer\UAS.cWa expression in adults is sufficient for the rescue of the fors visual memory defects.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWb via Scer\GAL4c819 is sufficient to restore visual pattern memory in fors flies.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWc via Scer\GAL4c819 is sufficient to restore visual pattern memory in fors flies.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWa driven by Scer\GAL4Mef2.247.Switch fails to rescue the memory defects of fors mutants.

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWa driven by Scer\GAL4C5 rescues only the defect in memory for "elevation", but not the defect in memory for "contour orientation".

Expression of forScer\UAS.cWb via Scer\GAL4Aph-4-c232 is not sufficient to restore visual pattern memory in fors flies.

Neuronal expression of forScer\UAS.T1 under the control of Scer\GAL4elav-C155 in fors mutants results in a significantly higher sucrose response in these flies compared to controls.

Neuronal expression of forScer\UAS.T2 under the control of Scer\GAL4elav-C155 in fors mutants results in a significantly higher sucrose response in these flies compared to controls.

Images (0)
Mutant
Wild-type
Stocks (1)
Notes on Origin
Discoverer
Comments
Comments

The differences in larval locomotion during foraging in larvae carrying different alleles of the for locus cannot be explained on the basis of muscle usage alone, and it is more likely that for affects larval ability to perceive or respond to the foraging environment.

Exposure to the parasitoid L.boulardi (ovipositor searching behaviour) parasitized the fors host strain far more than forR strains in population cage experiments. Exposure to the parasitoid Ganaspis xanthopoda (vibrotaxis searching behaviour) parasitized the forR host strain more than fors strains in population cage experiments.

Larvae forage close to the food source.

Exposure to the parasitoid A.tabida (vibrotactic search behaviour) parasitized the forR host strain more frequently than fors strains in population cage experiments. Larvae from cages with wasps develop a significantly higher frequency of encapsulation than those reared without wasps (increase in the proportion of larvae that produce a hardened capsule which encapsulates the wasp egg and ultimately kills the wasp larvae). A change in larval movement in cages with or without wasps is not detected.

External Crossreferences and Linkouts ( 0 )
Synonyms and Secondary IDs (6)
References (59)