FB2024_03 , released June 25, 2024
Allele: Dmel\forR
Open Close
General Information
Symbol
Dmel\forR
Species
D. melanogaster
Name
FlyBase ID
FBal0004143
Feature type
allele
Associated gene
Associated Insertion(s)
Carried in Construct
Also Known As
Rover
Key Links
Genomic Maps

Allele class
Nature of the Allele
Allele class
Progenitor genotype
Cytology
Description

The fors and forR alleles differ in a SNP that lies within a predicted Mad protein-binding site in a region upstream of the pr4 transcription start site. The SNP is a C in fors and an A in forR (the latter is predicted to reduce Mad protein binding).

Mutations Mapped to the Genome
Curation Data
Type
Location
Additional Notes
References
Nucleotide change:

C3632224A

Comment:

The fors (sitter) and forR (rover) alleles differ in a SNP that lies within a predicted Mad protein-binding site in a region upstream of the pr4 transcription start site. The SNP is a C in fors and an A in forR (the latter is predicted to reduce Mad protein binding).

Variant Molecular Consequences
Associated Sequence Data
DNA sequence
Protein sequence
 
Expression Data
Reporter Expression
Additional Information
Statement
Reference
 
Marker for
Reflects expression of
Reporter construct used in assay
Human Disease Associations
Disease Ontology (DO) Annotations
Models Based on Experimental Evidence ( 0 )
Disease
Evidence
References
Modifiers Based on Experimental Evidence ( 0 )
Disease
Interaction
References
Comments on Models/Modifiers Based on Experimental Evidence ( 0 )
 
Disease-implicated variant(s)
 
Phenotypic Data
Phenotypic Class
Phenotype Manifest In
Detailed Description
Statement
Reference

forR/forR third instar larvae display a significantly longer travel path during feeding and reduced food intake compared to fors/fors larvae.

forR homozygous larvae show significant increase in travel path length during feeding and food search compared to fors homozygotes, while the path length of forR/fors transheterozygotes is not significantly different from forR homozygotes. However, the food intake of forR larvae is significantly lower than that of both fors and forR/fors mutants. for0/forR transheterozygotes display longer travel path and reduced food intake compared to for0/fors.

forR/fors have a similar foraging success to flies homozygous for forR which is significantly higher than fors homozygotes.

Expressing fordsRNA.UAS.pr4 under the control of Scer\GAL4da.PU in a forR/fors background has no effect on foraging success or distance travelled when compared to forR/fors controls.

The 'food leaving' behaviour score for forR flies is low for flies raised in food-deprived conditions and high for flies raised in well-fed conditions. The increase in the score from food-deprived to well-fed is greater for forR than fors or fors2 flies.

The increase seen in metabolite content of adult heads in forR flies raised on food-deprived versus well-fed conditions is greater than fors2 flies in the case of lipids, but less than fors2 flies in the case of carbohydrates.

In well-fed conditions, adult forR flies have almost twice as much energy stored in whole-body lipid and about half the energy stored in carbohydrates compared to adult fors or fors2 flies.

forR flies exhibit greater food-related plasticity than fors or fors2 flies for a large majority of behavioural, metabolic and gene expression traits.

Homozygous forR flies exhibit pattern memory that is not significantly different from that of wild-type controls. forR/Df(2L)ed1 and forR/fors flies show impaired visual pattern memory.

Similarly to wild-type flies, homozygous forR flies are able to recognise different patterns. The thermotolerance of homozygous forR mutants is similar to that of wild-type flies.

Fifteen minutes after a single conditioning cycle or a spaced (five conditioning cycles separated by 20-minute intervals) protocol, forR homozygous mutants show stronger avoidance of the odor previously associated with shock than fors or fors2 homozygous mutants .

24 hours after a spaced (five conditioning cycles separated by 20-minute intervals) protocol, the forR homozygous mutants show weaker memory of the association between an odor and shock than fors or fors2 homozygous mutants.

24 hours after a massed (five conditioning cycles immediately after one another) protocol, there is no difference between forR, fors and fors2 homozygous mutants.

In fors homozygous mutants, expression of forUAS.T2 under the control of either Scer\GAL430Y,

Scer\GAL4c739 or Scer\GAL4Tab2-201Y leads to higher fifteen-minute memory scores after a single conditioning cycle (similar to those observed in forR homozygous mutants) and lower 24 hour memory scores after a spaced protocol (similar to or below those observed in forR homozygous mutants) when compared to controls.

forR adults are significantly more active compared to fors adults in a locomotor activity assay.

A significant increase in capa-stimulated fluid transport is observed at 50 and 60 minutes in Malpighian tubules from fors animals, compared to those from forR animals. This difference is especially pronounced at 60 minutes. There is no difference in basal fluid transport rates between the two lines.

fors flies show a more rapid response decrement of the long-latency giant fiber response induced by electrical stimulation than forR flies. forR/fors flies show a rate of response decrement intermediate between that of fors and that of forR.

forR and forR/fors flies show full recovery from decrement to five-failure criterion of the long-latency electrically induced giant fiber response after 5 seconds of rest.

forR larvae do not show "scribbler" behaviour (significantly more turning behaviour than wild-type larvae) on non-nutritive agar.

In the giant neuron culture system neither spontaneous nerve firing nor supernumerary aftershock nerve spikes are evident. In voltage clamp experiments, fors and fors2 neurons show significantly lower levels of both peak and sustained outward currents compared with forR. Half-activation voltages of the peak (but not sustained) K+ currents in fors and fors2 are shifted towards positive potentials compared with forR. Slopes of voltage dependent activation are similar for the three alleles for both peak and sustained currents. Small amplitude (>0.5nA) spontaneous ejcs occur at low frequency (<2Hz). Motor terminal projections on the larval muscles are anatomically normal.

The initial response to 1% oxygen hypoxia, cessation of feeding and movement to the surface of the yeast, occurs similarly in forR and fors, though the fors larvae move more slowly. However significantly fewer fors than forR (13% as opposed to 49%) go on the next phase of the behavioral response, migrating away from the yeast. While fors embryos survive 12 hrs of hypoxia poorly, forR embryos survive well. fors larvae also recover less well from hypoxia than do forR larvae. Hypoxia blocks BrdU incorporation in cultured CNS of forR, but not fors larvae. fors embryos retain the ability to block S phase under hypoxia.

The olfactory response of homozygous forR and homozygous fors2 larvae to a food attractant is not significantly different. The number of homozygous fors2 adult flies in an olfactory trap containing a food medium attractant after 48 hours is significantly greater than that of homozygous forR adult flies. The increased olfactory trap response of fors2 is recessive to the olfactory trap response of the forR allele. The olfactory avoidance responses of forR and fors2 adult flies to propionic acid, ethyl acetate and acetone do not differ significantly.

forR larvae show "rover-like" foraging behaviour. nobKS49; forR larvae show "sitter-like" foraging behaviour. forR adults walk further from a recently ingested sucrose source than fors2 flies. Csr3 does not increase walking distance in combination with either for allele.

Homozygous forR larvae have longer crawling paths than homozygous fors larvae, and are parisitised more often by A.tabida than homozygous fors larvae. Homozygous third instar larvae have longer crawling paths than homozygous second instar larvae.

Larvae have longer locomotory trails than larvae for fors.

Adults carrying the R allele walk farther from food source after feeding than do adults with the S strain. Unlike in larval tests, the rover behavior of adults is not dominant over the sitter behavior.

Larvae homozygous for the "sitter" alleles fors or forlsR92 move equally as well as larvae homozygous for the "rover" forR allele on non-nutritive substrates. Larvae homozygous for the forR allele take more strides, not longer ones, than larvae carrying fors or forlsR92 on foraging substrates.

rover allele

External Data
Interactions
Show genetic interaction network for Enhancers & Suppressors
Phenotypic Class
Phenotype Manifest In
Additional Comments
Genetic Interactions
Statement
Reference

G9aDD1 homozygosity eliminates the differences in foraging behavior between forR homozygotes, fors homozygotes or forR/fors heterozygotes. No difference in foraging success is observed between forR homozygotes carrying wild-type G9a or G9aDD1 alleles.

Flies double homozygous for G9aDD1 and forR live significantly longer when starved than flies carrying wild-type alleles of G9a. The increase in starvation resistance is significantly greater in fors than forR homozygotes.

CG11699EY05909 forR double mutant flies show the same profile as CG11699EY05909 single mutant flies in an olfaction-based exploration assay when benzaldehyde is used as the odour source.

forR, InR93Dj-4 or forR, Pi3K92EB double mutant flies show more sitter-like 'food-leaving' behaviour compared to forR single mutants. In contrast, the 'food-leaving' behaviour of forR, foxo21 flies is not significantly different from forR flies.

Trans-heterozygous forR +/+ lilli189Y flies show impaired visual pattern memory.

Xenogenetic Interactions
Statement
Reference
Complementation and Rescue Data
Comments
Images (0)
Mutant
Wild-type
Stocks (0)
Notes on Origin
Discoverer
Comments
Comments

The differences in larval locomotion during foraging in larvae carrying different alleles of the for locus cannot be explained on the basis of muscle usage alone, and it is more likely that for affects larval ability to perceive or respond to the foraging environment.

Exposure to the parasitoid L.boulardi (ovipositor searching behaviour) parasitized the fors host strain far more than forR strains in population cage experiments. Exposure to the parasitoid Ganaspis xanthopoda (vibrotaxis searching behaviour) parasitized the forR host strain more than fors strains in population cage experiments.

Larvae forage over large distances.

Exposure to the parasitoid A.tabida (vibrotactic search behaviour) parasitized the forR host strain more frequently than fors strains in population cage experiments. Larvae from cages with wasps develop a significantly higher frequency of encapsulation than those reared without wasps (increase in the proportion of larvae that produce a hardened capsule which encapsulates the wasp egg and ultimately kills the wasp larvae). A change in larval movement in cages with or without wasps is not detected.

External Crossreferences and Linkouts ( 0 )
Synonyms and Secondary IDs (6)
References (60)