visible (with Df(3R)by62)
visible (with Glut4EF10477)
visible (with Glut4EFNP7418)
visible (with Glut4EFsep)
wing (with Df(3R)by62)
wing (with Df(3R)swp2MICAL)
wing (with Glut4EF10477)
wing (with Glut4EFEY03156)
wing (with Glut4EFEY04651)
wing (with Glut4EFNP7418)
wing (with Glut4EFsep)
Heterozygotes do not have a held-out wings phenotype.
Glut4EFAntp-R, tna[+]/tna1 has visible | dominant phenotype
Glut4EFAntp-R, tna[+]/tna1 has wing phenotype
The wing positioning defects in In(3R)AntpR flies were previously attributed to an effect on Antp (FBrf0107412 and FBrf0155711), however, complementation analysis in FBrf0204343 indicates that the Glut4EF gene is also disrupted by the In(3R)AntpR chromosome and suggests that the wing positioning defects are caused instead by an effect on Glut4EF.
FlyBase curator comment: FBrf0155711 attributes the wing positioning defects in In(3R)AntpR flies to an effect on Antp. However, complementation analysis in FBrf0204343 indicates that the Glut4EF gene is also disrupted by the In(3R)AntpR chromosome and suggests that the wing positioning defects are caused instead by an effect on Glut4EF.
FlyBase curator comment: FBrf0107412 attributes the wing positioning defects in In(3R)AntpR flies to an effect on Antp. However, complementation analysis in FBrf0204343 indicates that the Glut4EF gene is also disrupted by the In(3R)AntpR chromosome and suggests that the wing positioning defects are caused instead by an effect on Glut4EF.